Month: October 2024

Q: I am fearful as a driver, especially during the short daylight time of year when I see so many bicyclists wearing dark clothing, and with no reflectors, taillights or headlights. Are there no laws requiring lights and/or reflectors on bicycles at night and if there are, why are violators not cited by law enforcement more often?

A: Years ago I took a bike ride in a new-to-me part of our fine state. Given the route, I was sure I would get back before dark. And from this setup, you already know I didn’t. Well into the ride I came to a tee in the road that I didn’t remember on the map. To the left was a sign that read, “Watch for bears,” so I went right, and ended up going miles in the wrong direction. By the time I got reoriented I knew I’d be ending this ride in the dark. And as a committed daytime-only rider, I didn’t have lights on my bike.

Continue reading “Riding Bikes in the Dark”

Q: I’ve seen some tiny car-like vehicles available in Europe (from Citroen and Fiat, for example), called quadricycles. Any chance we’ll see those in the US any time soon? Are they street-legal here?

A: I don’t know how interested a car manufacturer like Fiat or Citroen is in importing their tiny quadricycles into a market that’s obsessed with giant SUVs and pickups, even if they could. But in Washington you’d be allowed to drive one on the road, with limitations, if you could get one (and that’s the tricky part).

Continue reading “Tiny Transportation”

Q: What are the rules on what bike lanes can be used for?  I’ve scoured state and local codes and can find no mention of this.  Surely, they are reserved at least to some degree for bikes.

A: Obviously, you can’t drive in a bike lane, right? That would defeat the whole point of having them. But where does the law say that? You’d think there would be a law in the traffic code that says, “Don’t drive in the bike lanes.” If there is, I couldn’t find it. But it must be on the books somewhere, because the Washington Driver Guide says it’s not allowed: “Do not drive in a bicycle lane except when making a turn or when you need to cross the bicycle lane to park near the curb.”

Continue reading “Who Are Bike Lanes For, Really?”

Q: I have a question about two-lane right turns. Can you take a right turn on a red light on the outer lane of the two lanes too? Everybody does it, but I’m never sure if I am really allowed to do it.

A: For the people who need an answer to this question right now, yes, you can make a right turn on a red light in either lane. The same rules apply to both lanes. And for the folks who aren’t willing to accept a “yes” without evidence, even if it’s the answer you want, thank you for your skepticism. The most important time to question something is when it aligns with the outcome you were hoping for.

The Revised Code of Washington has the evidence you’re looking for, so we’ll start there. And then as a bonus, we’ll take a look at another law that, on the face of it, would seem to outlaw a second right turn lane entirely.

Continue reading “Two Right Turn Lanes and Red Lights”

Q: You’ve mentioned before that the book of traffic laws is very thick. So that leads to what I think is a reasonable question: Is it realistic to actually know all the traffic laws? And assuming it’s not, how can I as a driver be held responsible for laws I don’t know (or even know they exist)?

A: The Revised Code of Washington, Title 46, (Washington’s book of vehicle and traffic laws) is about half a million words long. That’s approaching Leo Tolstoy’s War and Peace, and some parts of Title 46 are only slightly easier for the average monolingual American to understand than reading Tolstoy’s tome in its original language. No, it’s absolutely not realistic for a driver (or police officer, traffic prosecutor, defense attorney, or judge) to have all those laws embedded in their brain cells.

Continue reading “Should You Know All the Laws?”