Category: Road Rules

Posted on

Dead End vs. No Outlet – The Roads to Nowhere

Q: Why are some roads marked “Dead End” and some marked “No Outlet?” Is there a difference?

A: One theory is that wealthy neighborhoods petitioned to eliminate “Dead End” signs from their streets because it reflected poorly on the status of their residents. But that’s completely untrue. There’s a manual that traffic engineers use when determining appropriate sign usage. The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) specifies that the “Dead End” sign may be used at the entrance of a single road that terminates or ends in a cul-de-sac, while the “No Outlet” sign may be used at the entrance to a road network from which there is no other exit. The sign choice comes down to whether it’s just one road or more than one road with no other way out.

Posted on

Fender Offenders

Q: How far can tires legally extend outside the body of a pickup?

A: Sometimes I wonder if when I answer a question I’m unwittingly assisting someone in winning an argument. So I have my own question in response to this one: Are you asking because you want to make sure your pickup complies with the law, or because you made a bet? I’m okay with either option; I’m just curious. Continue reading “Fender Offenders”

Posted on

Turn Signals and Turn Lanes

Q: If I’m in a lane that is designated for right or left turns only, do I really need to use my turn signal?

A: The answer according to Washington’s law is, “Yes.” That answer finds it’s support in RCW 46.61.305, which states, “No person shall turn a vehicle or move right or left upon a roadway unless and until such movement can be made with reasonable safety nor without giving an appropriate signal . . .” Unlike many of the other RCWs we’ve addressed in Road Rules, this one doesn’t have any exceptions. Even in a designated turn lane, a turn signal is required. Continue reading “Turn Signals and Turn Lanes”

Posted on

Bumper Cars and Parking Karma

Q: A driver who was paralleled parked backed up to get more space in front in order to leave, but in the process, bumped into the car behind. The driver got out, looked at the two cars’ bumpers, and drove off. As a pedestrian, I observed this happen and noticed that there didn’t seem to be any damage to the other car’s bumper. Did the driver handle this situation correctly?

A: I suspect that the scenario you described happens with moderate frequency. I know I’ve witnessed similar events, where a driver checks for damage from a parking lot bump, and seeing none, leaves. I’m willing to bet that most people think, “No damage, no foul.” But even though that’s how drivers often handle the situation, it doesn’t make it right according to the law. Continue reading “Bumper Cars and Parking Karma”

Posted on

Crosswalks – Part 2

Previously we answered the original question about when motorists are supposed to stop at crosswalks, but I want to go a few steps further and look at pedestrian duties, crosswalk enforcement and survival skills. Let’s begin with rules for pedestrians crossing the street; first in crosswalks and then at other locations. At crosswalks pedestrians really only have one rule: Don’t run out in front of a car, making it impossible for the driver to stop in time. Again, seems obvious. However, have you ever seen a pedestrian step into a crosswalk, right in front of a car, because sending a text message was higher priority than checking for traffic? Cars are required to yield the right-of-way to pedestrians in crosswalks, but that doesn’t relieve the pedestrian of the requirement to pay attention and have reasonable expectations about how much distance it takes a car to stop. Continue reading “Crosswalks – Part 2”

Posted on

Blinding Brake Lights

Q: I was following a newer Escalade a few nights ago. At a stop sign, when the driver applied the brakes, I was blinded by the stop lights. This sounds like a minor complaint, but it was dark and I couldn’t see for several seconds. The RCW does not address the brightness of rear lighting. What gives?

A: On the face of it, you’re right. If you search the Revised Code of Washington (RCW) you won’t find any statute that specifies a maximum brightness for brake lights. However, I can make a trail from state to federal law that will answer your question. While you will find general vehicle equipment requirements in state law, the federal government regulates the details in the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS). These details are what vehicle manufacturers have to comply with in order to sell a vehicle in the United States. FMVSS 108 covers vehicle lighting. If you have a degree in industrial engineering and an abundance of time you may find it an enjoyable read. For the rest of us, it’s enough to know that one of the charts in the code specifies a minimum and maximum intensity for stop lamps. Continue reading “Blinding Brake Lights”

Posted on

How Much Traffic Enforcement Is Enough?

Q: You say that the Whatcom County Target Zero Task Force has a vision to reduce traffic fatalities and serious injuries to zero by 2030 but what is being done to achieve that goal? Every day I see worrisome traffic infractions – speeding, tailgating, texting, passing in no-passing zones; but I seldom see a police presence. The recent spate of fatal accidents caused by irresponsible drivers is frightening. I know that at any time I could become a statistic. Isn’t it time to get tough and send a message that driving is a privilege, not a right, and with that privilege comes serious consequences for flouting the law?

A: Even edited to half its original length, this two-part question still conveys the passion of someone that wants to see a change in driving behavior. And for good reason; in 2014 Washington lost 462 people in fatal crashes, and over 2000 people were seriously injured. The data for 2015 isn’t complete yet, but it may be even higher. Vehicle crashes are the leading cause of death for teens and young adults. Clearly, this is a serious issue. Continue reading “How Much Traffic Enforcement Is Enough?”

Posted on

Bicycle Question Round-up Part 2

It’s time for bicycle question round-up part two. You’ve been asking a lot of questions about where bikes should ride; bike lane, sidewalk, or roadway. Let’s take a look at what’s legal, and what’s smart.

1. Is it legal to ride a bike on the sidewalk, and if so, who has the right-of-way? How about switching between the street and the sidewalk?

Riding a bike on the sidewalk is usually legal, and for a few cyclists it might be the right choice. When riding on the sidewalk, a cyclist is required to yield the right-of-way to pedestrians. For young cyclists that don’t have the confidence or experience to ride in a bike lane or on the street, riding on a sidewalk makes sense. It’s safer, and really, a five-year-old that’s just learned to ride doesn’t travel much faster than a pedestrian. I can also think of a couple situations when experienced cyclists might choose a sidewalk over a road. When traffic conditions are dangerous the sidewalk might be the safest choice, and on a steep hill without a bike lane, a cyclist riding at a slow pace might move to the sidewalk for safety, and also to open up the roadway for traffic. Continue reading “Bicycle Question Round-up Part 2”

Posted on

Crosswalks – Part 1

Q: Crosswalks Part One: Can you please explain crosswalks, and when motorists are supposed to stop, including unmarked crosswalks?

A: Ah, yes, crosswalks. On the surface it seems so obvious; when a pedestrian is in a crosswalk, drivers should stop. But there’s more to it than that, including the question, “What is a crosswalk?” Until I read the definition of a crosswalk in the Revised Code of Washington years ago, I thought a crosswalk was the white paint on the road that pedestrians used to get across intersections. While that is a crosswalk, it is not the only kind. When you approach an intersection and see the stripes just beyond the stop line, you’re seeing a marked crosswalk. However, if you were to come to an intersection without the painted crossing markings, you’d still be approaching a crosswalk, but in this case it would be an unmarked crosswalk. Confused yet? Just remember that painted on the road or not, that ten foot wide strip between where you’re supposed to stop at an intersection and where the lanes of travel cross over each other is a crosswalk. Continue reading “Crosswalks – Part 1”

Posted on

Escape From a Texting Driver

Q: The person driving behind me is obviously texting… I can see the top of their head for 10 seconds at a time in my rear-view mirror. If I speed up over the speed limit to put some space between myself and the texter, will the officer who pulls me over understand?

A: I’m getting into some dangerous territory trying to answer this question, as you’ve asked me to respond on behalf of the law enforcement officer that might stop you if you speed to get away from that bonehead driver texting behind you. I don’t think I can make that prediction, so I’m going to take a different approach. We’ve heard a lot about distracted driving and the increased risk of collisions. Current studies indicate that a texting driver is as at least as serious a risk as an impaired driver. I know when I’ve been driving near what appears to be a drunk driver, I give myself some distance. And call 911. Continue reading “Escape From a Texting Driver”